Not Signed-In
Which clippings match 'Videotaped Footage' keyword pg.1 of 1
20 APRIL 2012

The amateur video which sparked the 1992 Los Angeles Civil Unrest

"in March 1991, television screens across the world broadcast [George Holliday's] videotaped footage of LAPD officers raining down 56 baton blows on an African American named Rodney King. ... on April 29, 1992, a jury in Simi Valley, one of the whitest exurbs of Los Angeles, acquitted three of the four officers involved in beating Rodney King. The response in South Los Angeles was loud and immediate: That night, thousands of residents, black and Latino, took to the streets, starting a four-day riot that destroyed more than 1,000 buildings, injured 2,500 people, killed 58, and resulted in $1 billion in damage and 16,000 arrests."

(Josh Sides, 19/04/2012, Design Observer)

1
2

TAGS

19911992 • 1992 Los Angeles Civil Unrest • acquitted • African American • amateuramateur cameraamateur videoarsonassault • baton • beating • brutality • bystandercitiescitizen journalismcivic engagementcivil disobedience • civil unrest • damageethics • exurb • eyewitnessforce of law • George Holliday • high-speed pursuit • Hispanic • injusticejustice • LAPD • Latasha Harlins • Latino • looting • Los Angeles • Los Angeles Police Department • Los Angeles Riots • manslaughter • motorist • murderpolice • police officer • povertypower corrupts • property damages • real behaviourriot • rioted • riots • Rodney King • self-control • Simi Valley • social differentiationsocial responsibility • South Central Riots • suffering injustice • television report • unethical behaviour • unjustunjust powervideotapedvideotaped footage

CONTRIBUTOR

Simon Perkins
11 APRIL 2007

September 11, 2001: What We Saw: Frequently Asked Questions

"we've compiled a FAQ to answer common questions: Q. Why did you choose to release the video now? A. We have wanted to release the video for some time, but had not found the appropriate venue. We offered it to a local public television station, but they did not respond. ...

Q. Isn't this video missing important scenes? A. We did not capture the impact of either plane or the start of either building's collapse. As many have surmised, the impacts of the airplanes and collapses of both buildings did catch us by surprise.

Q. Why did you edit this video? A. The version we released on 9-11-2006 was intentionally and obviously (using dissolves) edited for length and size only. About 10 minutes of mostly redundant video was removed. None of the media services could host the unedited file at sufficiently high resolution.

Q. Will you release the unedited version? A. We had intended to, but our plans our on hold at the moment due to time and logistical concerns. We do not feel the high-res version shows anything more than the edited version, and we don't wish to stroke any purient interests. We do not intended to sell or profit from this video in any way. ...

Q. Who shot the video? A. Video was shot by Bri and Bob on a Sony DCR-TRV11 Camcorder. A few days after the tape was shot, we transferred the video to DVD using Apple iMovie and iDVD. The tape and DVD have never left our possession. The released video was transcoded from the DVD. The unedited version was re-transferred from the original tape."

(What We Saw, http://wtcbpc.blogspot.co.uk/)

Fig.1 Bri and Bob (9/11/2006). "September 11, 2001: What We Saw", [transcript from introduction to the video: "5 years ago today, we watched and filmed the attack on the WTC out of the window of home, 36 floors up and 500 yards away from the North Tower. Releasing this tape was a difficult decision for us because of its emotional and personal nature, and the potential for misuse. We feel, however, that our unique perspective has an important historical value, and shows the horror of the day without soundtracks or hype often seen in other accounts. Please be respectful of the contents of this account and be aware some may find the scenes on this video very disturbing. Please share only in its entirety.

We chose Revver to distribute our video because of its artist-friendly licensing terms and support for the Creative Commons. Bob and Bri 9/11/2006"].

1
2
3

TAGS

20012006 • 41 River Terrace • 9/11 • 911 • aeroplane • airplane • amateur videoapartment • Apple iMovie • Battery Park City North • Bob • Bri • Bri and Bob • building collapse • buildingscrashdebrisdust • edited version • eyewitnessGoogle Video • ground zero • home video • iDVD • impactManhattannews • North Tower • pilot • Revver • September 11 • September 11 2001 • September 11 attacks • Sony DCR-TRV11 Camcorder • South Tower • tall building • tapeterrorterrorismterrorist attacktowertoxic cloudTwin Towers • unedited file • videovideotapedvideotaped footage • What We Saw • World Trade Center • WTC • YouTube
17 DECEMBER 2003

NUD*IST: Qualitative Data Analysis System

"NUD*IST software was first developed by Tom Richards to support social research by Lyn Richards. One of the first qualitative research programs of its kind, the product stood for 'Non-Numerical Unstructured Data Indexing Searching and Theorizing'. It helps to change the way that qualitative research is conducted."

(QSR International Pty Ltd)

1

TAGS

business analystdata analysis • documentary material • health researcher • historianshistorical documentsinterviews • legal documents • legal researcher • literary critic • market analyst • N6 • non-textual documentary material • NUD*IST • qualitative • qualitative data analysis • social scientist • theory-building • Tom Richards • unstructured data • unstructured qualitative data • videotaped footage
Sign-In

Sign-In to Folksonomy

Can't access your account?

New to Folksonomy?

Sign-Up or learn more.